Dictionary of Primal Behaviour   www.urtica.org/interjections
     
[wip] Last updated: 01. 09. '03.    
     
Primal Chat . Model of primal communication  
Primal Chat [GPEM]
     

--Shared meaning


Our inner ideas, usual ways of thinking, symbols and codes result from our certain cultural experience, social system we live in, attitudes, knowledge, emotions... In order to communicate efficiently, both the encoder and the decoder must have common world knowledge and common linguistic knowledge. When their frames of experience overlap, a signal appears, the communication is established and the message is interpreted.

Possibility of decoding is determined by the ratio between redundancy and entropy in the message. Redundancy depends on familiarity with the code and the conventions, which governs the given symbols. It is the name for the predictable and the familiar in a message, recipient bases his interpretation on.

Dictionary of Primal Behaviour - common meaning of symbols

Shared meaning
[table1: shared meaning]


To make the message, esthetic message in this case, maximally readable we have decided to use symbols connected to primal human emotions and behaviour.

First step was to create a database, Dictionary of Primal Behaviour [], composed of symbols: graphics, words, sounds and facial expressions. Using these symbols we are able to code Graphically and Phonetically Expressive Message (GPEM ) that is understandable to wide audience despite their cultural background, linguistic knowledge or stylistic features of a language such as dialect, sociolect and chronolect.

 
Summary

Communication
.
communicative intention
. interpretation
. feedback

Language
.
a deposit of symbols
. substance of thought

>Shared meaning
. frame of experience
. redundancy and entropy

>GPE message
. PEW
. GES
. FE




 
general notice: All linguistic mistakes in essay "Primal Chat" are part of the concept that proofs efficacy of GPEM. Mistakes are not in any case connected with author's insufficient knowledge of English. ha-ha
 
 
Thank you for your attention
 
(c) 2003 Urtica, art and media research group
 
mm